Saturday, 5 September 2026 Current Affairs, GK Notes & MCQ Quiz

India advances geothermal energy with its first 1 MW demonstration plant at Puga Valley, Ladakh, backed by the National Policy on Geothermal Energy 2025; an ICCT study projects 25 billion annual import savings by 2050 through faster EV adoption; LAHDCs extended to all seven Ladakh districts; PIF faces China-Taiwan diplomatic turbulence; UIDAI's OVSE framework onboards its first school board and university.

Topics in this edition

  1. Faster EV Adoption Could Cut India's Import Bill by 25 Billion by 2050 (own page)
  2. Autonomous Hill Development Councils Extended to All Seven Districts of Ladakh (own page)
  3. Pacific Islands Forum (PIF): Geopolitical Turbulence Over Taiwan's Participation (own page)
  4. UIDAI's Offline Verification Seeking Entity (OVSE) Framework (own page)
  5. Kenya's Dispute with Tata Chemicals Over Lake Magadi Operations (own page)
  6. Northern Goshawk: Species in News (own page)
  7. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan: Philosopher, Educationist, and Statesman (own page)

Current affairs

Faster EV Adoption Could Cut India's Import Bill by 25 Billion by 2050

An ICCT study estimates that ambitious EV adoption combined with domestic battery manufacturing could reduce India's annual oil and battery import bill from 53 billion to about $28 billion by 2050. EV adoption alone accounts for $94 billion in annual savings, while high battery localisation adds another $31 billion.

Quick highlights

  • Ambitious EV adoption with high battery localisation could reduce India's annual import bill from 53 billion to ~$28 billion by 2050 — savings of 25 billion.
  • Faster electrification alone saves ~$94 billion annually, even with full battery cell imports.
  • High domestic battery manufacturing adds an additional $31 billion in annual savings by 2050.
  • EV battery demand could reach ~573 GWh annually by 2050 under faster electrification scenarios.
  • Higher global crude prices amplify the benefits of electrification by reducing India's exposure to volatile petroleum costs.

Context

A new International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) study estimates that faster electric vehicle adoption, combined with domestic battery manufacturing, could reduce India's annual oil and battery import bill by up to 25 billion by 2050. The study evaluates three EV pathways — Baseline, Momentum, and Ambitious — along with different levels of battery manufacturing localisation.

Key Facts

Under the Ambitious pathway with high battery localisation, India's annual import bill could drop from 53 billion to about $28 billion by 2050. EV adoption is the primary driver, saving ~$94 billion annually even if India continues importing all battery cells. High domestic battery cell manufacturing adds $31 billion in additional annual savings. EV battery demand could surge to approximately 573 GWh annually by 2050 under faster electrification scenarios, making domestic cell manufacturing strategically critical.

Significance

Reduces dependence on imported crude oil and vulnerability to geopolitical shocks and global oil-price volatility. Battery localisation strengthens Atmanirbhar Bharat, domestic value chains, technology capabilities, and EV manufacturing ecosystems. Faster electrification lowers transport-sector fossil-fuel consumption and supports India's decarbonisation and net-zero transition. Higher crude prices substantially increase electrification benefits.

Challenges / Way Forward

Building gigascale domestic battery cell manufacturing capacity requires massive capital investment, raw material supply chains (lithium, cobalt, nickel), and technological know-how. Charging infrastructure across urban and rural India needs rapid scaling. Ensuring grid readiness for 573 GWh of additional demand is essential. Policy continuity in FAME-type incentive schemes and PLI schemes for ACC batteries is critical for sustained industry growth.

Exam Angle

Prelims: ICCT study findings, 25 billion savings, 573 GWh battery demand, three pathways (Baseline/Momentum/Ambitious). Mains (GS III — Economy/Energy): Assess how faster EV adoption can strengthen India's energy security. Evaluate the role of domestic battery manufacturing in achieving Atmanirbhar Bharat. Essay: Sustainable development, energy transition, technological self-reliance and green growth.

Remember this

  • ICCT study: 25 billion annual import savings by 2050 with ambitious EV adoption + battery localisation.
  • Import bill reduction: 53 billion → ~$28 billion annually by 2050.
  • EV adoption alone saves ~$94 billion; battery localisation adds $31 billion more.
  • EV battery demand may reach ~573 GWh annually by 2050.
  • Three pathways evaluated: Baseline, Momentum, Ambitious.
  • Higher crude oil prices amplify electrification benefits.

Autonomous Hill Development Councils Extended to All Seven Districts of Ladakh

Ladakh Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena approved extending Autonomous Hill Development Councils (LAHDCs) to all seven districts of the Union Territory, including five newly carved districts — Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar, and Drass. The LAHDCs are decentralized elected governance bodies modelled on West Bengal's Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council, originally established under the LAHDC Act, 1997.

Quick highlights

  • LAHDCs extended from Leh and Kargil to five new districts: Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar, and Drass — covering all seven Ladakh districts.
  • Modelled on West Bengal's Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council; enabled by LAHDC Act, 1995 (consolidated under 1997 Act).
  • Council structure: 30 members (26 elected + 4 nominated for women and minorities), five-year term.
  • Executive: Chief Executive Councillor (CEC) with Cabinet Minister rank; four Executive Councillors with Deputy Minister rank.
  • Deputy Commissioner serves ex-officio as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the council.
  • Functions include land allocation, district planning, education, health, agriculture, livestock, and cultural heritage preservation.

Context

Ladakh Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena approved a notification extending Autonomous Hill Development Councils to all seven districts of the Union Territory. This expands elected local self-governance from Leh and Kargil into five newly carved districts: Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar, and Drass. LAHDCs are decentralized, elected statutory district-level governance bodies established to provide local self-rule, plan socioeconomic development, and manage land and resources in Ladakh's mountainous terrain.

Key Facts

History: Conceived on the pattern of West Bengal's Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council following prolonged agitations for regional autonomy. Enabled by the LAHDC Act, 1995 (consolidated under 1997). LAHDC Leh established in 1995; LAHDC Kargil in July 2003 under J&K CM Mufti Mohammad Sayeed. Governance structure: Council of 30 members (26 directly elected, 4 nominated by LG for women and religious minorities) serving a five-year term. Led by Chairman/Chief Executive Councillor (CEC) with Cabinet Minister rank, assisted by four Executive Councillors with Deputy Minister rank. The Deputy Commissioner acts ex-officio as CEO. Functions: land allocation and resource management, district planning, centrally sponsored schemes, primary/secondary education, vocational institutes, public health, sanitation, local roads, agriculture, water canals, fisheries, pasture management, pashmina goat and yak veterinary care, eco-tourism, and cultural/monastic heritage preservation.

Significance

Deepens democratic decentralization in India's most remote and strategically sensitive UT. Brings elected representation closer to tribal and pastoral communities in Changthang, Nubra, and Zanskar who previously had limited governance access. Addresses longstanding demands of Ladakhi people for greater regional autonomy. Strengthens administrative presence in border districts adjacent to the LAC with China and the LoC with Pakistan.

Challenges / Way Forward

Ensuring adequate fiscal devolution and administrative capacity in newly created councils will be critical. Balancing LAHDC autonomy with UT administration powers under the LG requires clear functional demarcation. Maintaining the ecological fragility of Changthang and Nubra while enabling development is essential. Protecting tribal land rights (especially of Changpa nomads) alongside development planning needs careful calibration. Demands for Sixth Schedule protection and statehood for Ladakh remain unaddressed.

Exam Angle

Prelims: LAHDC Act 1997, number of districts (7), composition (26+4=30), CEC rank (Cabinet Minister), CEO (Deputy Commissioner), model (Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council), five new districts. Mains (GS II — Polity/Governance): Evaluate the role of LAHDCs in providing democratic decentralization in Ladakh. How does the expansion address governance gaps in the UT? Compare with Sixth Schedule provisions.

Remember this

  • LAHDCs now cover all 7 Ladakh districts: Leh, Kargil, Sham, Nubra, Changthang, Zanskar, Drass.
  • Modelled on Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council; enabled by LAHDC Act, 1995/1997.
  • LAHDC Leh: 1995; LAHDC Kargil: July 2003.
  • Council: 30 members (26 elected + 4 nominated for women & minorities), 5-year term.
  • CEC = Cabinet Minister rank; 4 Executive Councillors = Deputy Minister rank.
  • Deputy Commissioner = ex-officio CEO of the council.
  • Functions: land management, district planning, education, health, agriculture, livestock, cultural heritage.
  • LG Vinai Kumar Saxena approved the notification for expansion.

Pacific Islands Forum (PIF): Geopolitical Turbulence Over Taiwan's Participation

The Pacific Islands Forum leaders' meeting faced sharp diplomatic turbulence and diminished attendance amid escalating geopolitical pressure from China over Taiwan's regional participation. PIF, the premier intergovernmental organization of 18 Pacific nations, operates under the 'One Blue Pacific Continent' vision for regional peace, climate advocacy, and maritime security.

Quick highlights

  • PIF leaders' meeting faced diplomatic turbulence from Chinese pressure over Taiwan's regional participation.
  • PIF: premier intergovernmental organization of 18 Pacific island nations and territories; founded 1971 in Wellington, NZ as South Pacific Forum; renamed 1999.
  • 18 members include Australia, NZ, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Kiribati, and others.
  • Vision: 'One Blue Pacific Continent' — regional peace, climate advocacy, maritime security, and collective diplomacy.
  • Post-Forum Dialogue (PFD) engages external partners including US, EU, China, Japan, and India.
  • Biketawa Declaration governs regional security and peacekeeping mandates.

Context

The Pacific Islands Forum leaders' meeting faced sharp diplomatic turbulence and diminished leadership attendance amid escalating geopolitical pressure from China over Taiwan's regional participation. PIF is the premier intergovernmental organization and political grouping in the Pacific, representing 18 island nations and territories across Oceania.

Key Facts

Founded in August 1971 in Wellington, New Zealand, as the South Pacific Forum (SPF); renamed Pacific Islands Forum in 1999 to reflect broader scope. 18 members: Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, French Polynesia, Kiribati, Nauru, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu. Vision: 'One Blue Pacific Continent.' Functions: regional policy harmonisation on fisheries, ocean governance, and sustainable development; regional security under the Biketawa Declaration; climate advocacy for low-lying islands; economic integration for trade, shipping, renewables, and tourism; Post-Forum Dialogue (PFD) with external partners including US, EU, China, Japan, and India.

Significance

PIF equips vulnerable atoll nations with collective bargaining power on global diplomatic and climate financing platforms. It represents a critical maritime theatre in the Indo-Pacific where major powers (US, China, Australia) compete for security access, diplomatic recognition, and development pacts. Climate advocacy is existential — low-lying members like Tuvalu and Kiribati face submergence from sea-level rise. The China-Taiwan contest for diplomatic recognition among PIF members directly impacts the forum's unity and effectiveness.

Challenges / Way Forward

Geopolitical competition between China and Taiwan/US is fragmenting PIF solidarity, with some members switching diplomatic recognition. Balancing development aid from China against strategic concerns of traditional partners (Australia, NZ, US) requires deft diplomacy. Climate financing pledges from larger powers often remain unfulfilled, testing PIF's advocacy credibility. Internal governance challenges, including capacity constraints in smaller island states, limit effective regional cooperation.

Exam Angle

Prelims: PIF founding (1971, Wellington), renaming (1999), 18 members, Biketawa Declaration, Post-Forum Dialogue, 'One Blue Pacific Continent.' Mains (GS II — IR): Discuss the strategic significance of the Pacific Islands Forum in the context of Indo-Pacific geopolitics. How does China-Taiwan rivalry impact regional cooperation among Pacific Island nations?

Remember this

  • PIF: founded August 1971 in Wellington, NZ as South Pacific Forum; renamed 1999.
  • 18 member nations/territories across Oceania; vision: 'One Blue Pacific Continent.'
  • Key members: Australia, NZ, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu, Kiribati, Solomon Islands.
  • Biketawa Declaration: mandate for regional security and peacekeeping.
  • Post-Forum Dialogue (PFD): engages external partners — US, EU, China, Japan, India.
  • Current tension: China's pressure over Taiwan's participation in PIF.

UIDAI's Offline Verification Seeking Entity (OVSE) Framework

Punjab School Education Board (PSEB) became India's first school board, and Maharishi Dayanand University (MDU), Rohtak, the first university, to onboard UIDAI's OVSE framework for secure offline identity verification. The framework enables local, privacy-preserving verification using digitally signed credentials without querying UIDAI's Central Identities Data Repository (CIDR).

Quick highlights

  • PSEB is India's first school education board and MDU Rohtak the first university to adopt UIDAI's OVSE framework.
  • OVSE enables offline identity verification using digitally signed, verifiable credentials without querying CIDR.
  • Nodal body: UIDAI under Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY).
  • Strict consent-driven: users control what information is shared; no national identity digits stored by verifiers.
  • Includes on-device face authentication and digital signatures for proof-of-presence without transmitting raw biometrics.
  • Eliminates physical document circulation, photocopying, and manual data entry — reducing identity theft and speeding up institutional processes.

Context

The Punjab School Education Board (PSEB) became India's first school education board, and Maharishi Dayanand University (MDU), Rohtak, became the first university, to onboard UIDAI's Offline Verification Seeking Entity (OVSE) framework. OVSE is a secure regulatory framework established by UIDAI that authorizes eligible organizations to carry out local, offline identity verification using verifiable digital credentials rather than querying central identity databases.

Key Facts

Nodal Organisation: UIDAI under MeitY. How it works: (1) Organization initiates offline verification via web portal, kiosk, or QR code; (2) User authorizes and consents to share specific credentials via official identity app; (3) Verification occurs locally on device (including offline biometric/face-match) without live CIDR connection; (4) Digitally signed credentials returned via secured callback URL. Key features: Zero dependency on central databases (no CIDR query); strict consent and selective sharing; Privacy by Design — no plain identity number storage, data must be masked/redacted; enterprise-ready interoperability via standardized APIs; proof-of-presence through on-device face authentication and digital signatures.

Significance

Eliminates circulation and photocopying of physical documents, directly addressing privacy risks and identity theft in institutions. Eliminates repetitive physical document verification and manual data entry, dramatically speeding up school admissions, exam registrations, and certificate issuance. Reduces load on UIDAI's central servers by enabling fully offline verification. Sets a precedent for other school boards, universities, and government departments to adopt privacy-preserving digital identity verification at scale.

Challenges / Way Forward

Ensuring device-level security and tamper-resistance for on-device face authentication is critical. Scaling adoption beyond PSEB and MDU to all state boards, universities, and government agencies requires institutional capacity building. Digital literacy and connectivity gaps in rural and semi-urban areas may limit immediate adoption. Maintaining interoperability standards as more entities onboard will require continuous technical governance.

Exam Angle

Prelims: OVSE framework — UIDAI, MeitY, CIDR (Central Identities Data Repository), PSEB (first school board), MDU Rohtak (first university), Privacy by Design. Mains (GS II — Governance / GS III — Technology): Evaluate UIDAI's OVSE framework as a model for privacy-preserving digital identity verification. How does it balance convenience with data protection?

Remember this

  • OVSE: Offline Verification Seeking Entity framework by UIDAI (under MeitY).
  • First school board: Punjab School Education Board (PSEB); first university: MDU, Rohtak.
  • Works offline — no live connection to UIDAI's Central Identities Data Repository (CIDR).
  • Consent-driven: users control what data is shared; verifiers cannot store plain identity numbers.
  • Includes on-device face authentication for proof-of-presence without transmitting raw biometrics.
  • Privacy by Design: data must be masked or redacted to minimize leak exposure.

Kenya's Dispute with Tata Chemicals Over Lake Magadi Operations

Kenya is involved in a dispute with Tata Chemicals over its operations at Lake Magadi, a soda ash-producing alkaline lake in Kenya's Rift Valley. The dispute highlights issues around foreign mining operations, resource sovereignty, and community rights in African nations.

Quick highlights

  • Kenya has a dispute with Tata Chemicals over operations at Lake Magadi.
  • Lake Magadi is a soda ash-producing alkaline lake in Kenya's Rift Valley.
  • The dispute raises issues of resource sovereignty, community rights, and foreign mining operations in Africa.
  • Relevant for UPSC in the context of India-Africa economic relations and corporate operations abroad.

Context

Kenya is involved in a dispute with Tata Chemicals over its operations at Lake Magadi. Lake Magadi is an alkaline lake in Kenya's Great Rift Valley known for soda ash (trona) production. The dispute highlights issues around foreign mining operations, resource sovereignty, and community rights.

Key Facts

Tata Chemicals has operated soda ash mining at Lake Magadi in Kenya's Rift Valley for several decades. Lake Magadi is one of the world's major natural sources of trona (soda ash). The dispute involves questions of lease terms, environmental impact, local community benefits, and resource governance.

Significance

The case reflects broader trends in Africa regarding resource nationalism and demands for greater local benefit-sharing from mining operations. It is significant for India-Africa economic and commercial relations. It raises questions about corporate responsibility and sustainable mining practices by Indian companies operating overseas.

Challenges / Way Forward

Balancing foreign investment with resource sovereignty and local community welfare remains a delicate policy challenge for African nations. Indian companies operating abroad must adopt best practices in environmental governance, community engagement, and transparency. Diplomatic channels between India and Kenya will be important for resolving commercial disputes while preserving broader bilateral ties.

Exam Angle

Prelims: Lake Magadi (Kenya, Rift Valley, soda ash/trona), Tata Chemicals. Mains (GS II — IR): Discuss the challenges faced by Indian companies operating in Africa's mining sector. How can India balance commercial interests with host-country sovereignty?

Remember this

  • Lake Magadi: alkaline lake in Kenya's Great Rift Valley; major soda ash (trona) source.
  • Tata Chemicals operates soda ash mining at Lake Magadi.
  • Dispute involves resource sovereignty, community rights, and mining lease terms.
  • Relevant for India-Africa economic relations and corporate responsibility abroad.

Northern Goshawk: Species in News

The Northern Goshawk is a powerful raptor of the family Accipitridae found across the Northern Hemisphere, including parts of the Himalayas and Northeast India. It is a forest-dwelling bird of prey known for its agility and is categorized under IUCN's Least Concern status.

Quick highlights

  • Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis): large raptor of the family Accipitridae.
  • Habitat: dense forests across the Northern Hemisphere including parts of the Indian Himalayas and Northeast India.
  • Known for exceptional agility and speed while hunting through forest canopies.
  • IUCN Status: Least Concern.

Context

The Northern Goshawk has been highlighted as a species in the news, relevant for UPSC Prelims species identification and environment questions.

Key Facts

Scientific name: Accipiter gentilis. Family: Accipitridae. Distribution: widespread across the Northern Hemisphere — North America, Europe, and Asia, including the Himalayas and parts of Northeast India. Habitat: dense temperate and boreal forests. It is a powerful, medium-to-large raptor known for hunting through forest canopy with exceptional agility. IUCN Red List Status: Least Concern.

Significance

The Northern Goshawk is an apex forest predator and a key indicator species for forest ecosystem health. Its presence in the Indian Himalayas makes it relevant for biodiversity conservation in high-altitude forests. It appears frequently in UPSC Prelims in species-mapping and IUCN status questions.

Challenges / Way Forward

Habitat loss from deforestation and forest fragmentation threaten goshawk populations globally. In India, conservation of old-growth Himalayan forests is essential for sustaining raptor populations. Climate change-induced shifts in prey distribution may affect goshawk habitats in high-altitude zones.

Exam Angle

Prelims: Northern Goshawk — family (Accipitridae), IUCN status (Least Concern), habitat (Northern Hemisphere, Himalayas), scientific name (Accipiter gentilis). Often tested in species-region mapping format.

Remember this

  • Northern Goshawk: Accipiter gentilis, family Accipitridae.
  • IUCN Status: Least Concern.
  • Habitat: dense forests of Northern Hemisphere including Indian Himalayas and Northeast India.
  • Apex forest predator; indicator species for forest ecosystem health.

General knowledge

Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan: Philosopher, Educationist, and Statesman

Teachers' Day is observed annually on September 5, marking the birth anniversary of Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan — India's first Vice President (1952–1962) and second President (1962–1967). A distinguished philosopher and scholar, he chaired the Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) that laid the foundation for modern higher education in India and the creation of the UGC.

Quick highlights

  • Born September 5, 1888, in Tiruttani; first Vice President of India (1952–1962); second President (1962–1967).
  • MA dissertation: 'The Ethics of the Vedanta and Its Metaphysical Presuppositions' from Madras University.
  • Chaired the Radhakrishnan Commission (University Education Commission, 1948–49), which led to the creation of UGC.
  • Vice-Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University (BHU), 1939–1948.
  • India's Ambassador to the Soviet Union, 1949–1952; UNESCO delegation leader.
  • Inaugural Bharat Ratna recipient (1954); Spalding Professor at Oxford University; Fellow of the British Academy (1939).

Context

President Droupadi Murmu extended greetings across the nation on the eve of Teachers' Day, observed annually on September 5 to mark the birth anniversary of celebrated philosopher, educationist, and former President of India, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan.

Key Facts

Born September 5, 1888, in Tiruttani (near Madras); formative years in pilgrimage towns like Tirupati. MA from Madras University with dissertation 'The Ethics of the Vedanta and Its Metaphysical Presuppositions.' Academic career began 1909 at Madras Presidency College; later Professor of Philosophy at University of Mysore; King George V Chair of Mental and Moral Science at University of Calcutta. Vice-Chancellor of BHU (1939–1948), protecting academic integrity during freedom movement. Chaired the Radhakrishnan Commission (University Education Commission, 1948–49), which established foundational policy architecture for modern higher education and led to creation of UGC. Ambassador to the Soviet Union (1949–1952); UNESCO delegation leader. First Vice President of India (1952–1962) and Chairman of Rajya Sabha. Second President of India (1962–1967) during the 1960s wars. Inaugural Bharat Ratna (1954). Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics at Oxford; Fellow of British Academy (1939).

Significance

The Radhakrishnan Commission laid the foundation for India's entire higher education policy architecture post-independence, directly leading to the University Grants Commission. His tenure as BHU Vice-Chancellor during the freedom movement protected academic freedom and nationalist ideas. As Ambassador to the Soviet Union during early Cold War tensions, he secured geopolitical respect for non-aligned India. He upheld democratic principles with non-partisan authority as President during a challenging period of wars. Teachers' Day celebrates his legacy as the embodiment of education's transformative power.

Challenges / Way Forward

While Teachers' Day honours the ideals Radhakrishnan championed, India's higher education system continues to face challenges in quality, equity, and research output. His vision of university autonomy and philosophical depth in education remains a benchmark for ongoing reforms under NEP 2020.

Exam Angle

Prelims: Born September 5, 1888; first VP (1952–62); second President (1962–67); Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) → UGC; BHU VC (1939–48); inaugural Bharat Ratna (1954); Ambassador to USSR; Spalding Professor at Oxford. Mains (GS I — Modern History/Society): Discuss Radhakrishnan's contribution to Indian higher education policy. Essay: Role of educators in nation-building.

Remember this

  • Born: September 5, 1888, Tiruttani; Teachers' Day observed on his birthday.
  • First Vice President of India: 1952–1962; Second President: 1962–1967.
  • Radhakrishnan Commission (University Education Commission, 1948–49) → led to creation of UGC.
  • Vice-Chancellor of BHU: 1939–1948.
  • Ambassador to Soviet Union: 1949–1952.
  • Inaugural Bharat Ratna: 1954 (first year of the award's institution).
  • Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics at Oxford; Fellow of British Academy (1939).
  • MA dissertation: 'The Ethics of the Vedanta and Its Metaphysical Presuppositions' (Madras University).

All editions · UPSC current affairs · SSC current affairs · Banking current affairs · Railway current affairs · State PSC current affairs · Defence current affairs · Teaching current affairs